Prioritise consequential tools
Start with payment, export, access-change and production-change workflows. Name the final executor and its owner.
Define where consequential actions are checked, who owns policy and what evidence establishes that enforcement works.
Valid identities and approved tools can still produce invalid business outcomes. Security teams need an explicit pre-execution control boundary and a way to test it as workflows change.
Start with payment, export, access-change and production-change workflows. Name the final executor and its owner.
Express the permitted actor, purpose, destination and delegated scope. Test a denied operation as well as normal business activity.
Use runtime attachment and outcome evidence to identify unconnected paths before expanding agent authority.
Bring a representative workflow to a deployment review. Agree the interception point, failure handling and evidence requirements with the team that owns the business system.
Try a local scenario, then bring your workflow to a deployment review. Start with one agent and one tool, and see exactly where the action can be stopped.